ARTICLES
The journal publishes original articles and short notes on recent case law. Each original scientific article must have a title, abstract, and keywords in Slovenian and English.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
All the articles submitted to the Dignitas – Slovenian Journal of Human Rights are peer-reviewed in double-blind form by two anonymous peer reviewers. The Editorial Board will inform the authors of the results of the reviewers’ and editors’ work on the text in due time. The Editors reserve the right to make necessary adjustments to the text according to the propositions and standards of the English and Slovenian languages.
PUBLICATION FREQUENCY
Dignitas – Slovenian Journal of Human Rights is published three times per year (in July, October and December).
PLAGIARISM DETECTION
New University is a member of the CrossCheck plagiarism detection initiative. In cases of suspected plagiarism CrossCheck report is available to editors of Dignitas – Slovenian Journal of Human Rights to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts. CrossCheck is a multi-publisher initiative allowing the screening of published and submitted content for originality.
PUBLICATION ETHICS AND PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
For all parties involved in the act of publishing (the author, the journal editor(s), the peer reviewer, and the publisher) it is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior. The ethics statements for Dignitas – Slovenian Journal of Human Rights are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
EDITOR RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Accountability
The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published, and, moreover, is accountable for everything published in the journal. In making these decisions, the editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board as well as by legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers when making publication decisions. The editor should maintain the integrity of the academic record, preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards, and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed.
2. Fairness
The editor should evaluate manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author(s). The editor will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers, and in some instances the editorial board members, as appropriate.
3. Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
4. Disclosure, conflicts of interest, and other issues
The editor will be guided by COPE’s Guidelines for Retracting Articles when considering retracting, issuing expressions of concern about, and issuing corrections pertaining to articles that have been published in Dignitas – Slovenian Journal of Human Rights.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
The editor is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
The editor should seek to ensure a fair and appropriate peer review process. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other members of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.
5. Involvement and cooperation in investigations
Editors should guard the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct. Editors should pursue reviewer and editorial misconduct. An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.